Regulating NSFW AI systems is an important issue because they could have a real effect on society. AI technologies in the United States are regulated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) with an emphasis on protecting consumers as well as their privacy. For example, the FTC rose up 30% in terms of the number of enforcement actions it targeted at AI-related companies from 2019 thru to four years later. These measures typically focus on deceptive practices and lack of data security.
This is responsible for GDPR in Europe. The GDPR makes a number of stiff demands about how data may be processed and kept private, which impacts NSFW AI systems. Under GDPR, fines can be as high as €20 million or 4% of an organisation's global turnover Just this year, in 2021, Amazon was slapped with a €746 million fine for GDPR violations -- testament to the strictness of the regulation.
In contrast, China has enforced the Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) to regulate AI systems such as NSFW AI. The PIPL means data handlers need to follow strict practices or potentially face fines of $775,000 — ¥50 million is the cap on that one! The law was applied in practice: In 2022 some Chinese tech companies were investigated for non-compliance.
In regulatory discussions, industry parlance is thrown around like "algorithmic transparency" and "data minimization." Accountability: Companies need to be held accountable for how their AI perform, which is possible through algorithmic transparency. Data minimization : Collecting as little personal data possible in order to minimize privacy risks. This underscores the tech thing when it comes to AI regulation.
This is also evidenced in the historical events. The world-wide adoption of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in 2018, arising out of the Cambridge Analytica scandal-a voter surveillance and mass media communications firm at least partly responsible for tilting elections based on aggressive misuse of personal data-has been a wake-up call. The event, which compromised the data of more than 87 million Facebook users was a catalyst for even closer examination and criticism over AI systems and companies' respective behaviour with user data.
Here are a few key quotes from leading voices in the industry on regulation. As Tesla CEO Elon Musk put it, "AI is a fundamental existential risk for human civilization." This is in keeping with the overall worry about unbounded AI Apple CEO Tim Cook said the same, stating that "Privacy to us is a human right.
For specific inquiries, one may ask: do regulations vary per territory? The answer is yes. Nevertheless, the regulatory frameworks in US, EU and China are very different due to them being based on a difference legal tradition and priorities. For the US it is consumer protection, for China its state control and cybersecurity meanwhile in EU data privacy.
To the extent that there is a takeaway with respect to regulation, it should be evident in this paper's broad framework on governing NSFW AI architectures across jurisdictions. Exactly where nsfw ai fits in here all remains to be seen through the adoption of these regulations, which are designed to promote innovation while providing essential safeguards with regard to how AI technologies will function within social and legal frameworks.
You can find more information on the NSFW AI side over there.